Go beyond “engagement” to actual involvement

In my previous post I wrote about what activation is, and The House That Twitter Built activation example. Now, let’s talk more about HOW to do it (strategy). It’s one thing to activate a truly grass roots movement, like the example in The House That Twitter Built. It’s another challenge entirely to activate around a brand or even a non-profit organization, right?

In his helpful post How To Integrate Social Media With Traditional Media, my wise friend Tom Martin (@tommartin on Twitter) says, “ask yourself – from a creative, offer or conversation perspective – how can you best connect with your audience?” and that is a great starting place. There are stories you can tell, utilities you can create, and people you can connect. We’ve talked about those things here before, and they are often where I start translating “traditional” features and benefits into online relevance.

Today, though, a few weeks after the experience that was #saveteecycle, I’m going to offer up a new overriding thought that I am carrying around with me. The single most important, effective social strategy that you should be considering – beyond telling stories, beyond being useful, beyond even connecting people is this simple:

INVOLVEMENT. Involvement trumps the overused “engagement” every time, IMHO. Engagement is great, but more passive. Involvement is you or your brand, ALL IN.

Creating ways for people to get involved with your brand is part of it, as I discussed in that previous post. For more on that, read this foundational post from Edward Boches, Four Criteria for Your Next Creative Idea (sharable, participatory, interactive and continuous).

Beyond that, if you are serious about social marketing, it is equally important that you get involved back. Make something happen. Get off the sidelines, where you are watching, possibly responding, which is all great, but not really enough for real activation purposes, and dive in head first. “Like what?” you may be thinking, if you’re jumping ahead to tactics which is just human nature. Well, you can make a lot of things happen. Here are a few thought starters for you.

You can make an event or a series of events happen, or a full-blown cause marketing program. Just make sure it’s something that your audience actually cares about. Putting events in the middle of your strategy feeds both digital content and PR content and sets up a cycle-of-messaging-awesomeness (registered trademark).

Or, try this approach. At any given time, there are myriad social events movements happening online already, large and small. Rather than create your own events, especially if you’re a small-to-medium business with limited marketing and human resources, find an existing event or movement that fits with what you stand for and ask how you can get involved with it. This can create social momentum for you with relatively little monetary investment; you will, however, generally have to invest some sweat equity. If you’re not willing to do that, this approach is not for you.

Another possibility: Surprise people. Show up. Be Johnny Depp showing up at an elementary school in your Captain Jack Sparrow costume. Metaphorically speaking, of course. How can you, as a brand, “show up” for your customers and fans in a new and surprising way? An example of this could be unexpected celebrity appearances, or it could be as “simple” as Nokia being at rock concerts with soundproof booths so people can talk on their cell phones (which also creates an off-the-charts amount of utility).

These are just some thought starters. The intention to get actively involved leads to different ways of thinking about tactics. Think way beyond “the conversation”. Think beyond “engagement”. Think about how you can get more actively involved with your audience and the things they care about. You still have to wrap it in engaging, sharable, participatory, interactive and continuous communication.

What do you think? Do you see getting more involved as a potential strategy for your brand? I’d love to hear what challenges you have with this and help talk them through. Or, if a higher level of involvement has worked for you, tell us about it so we can learn from it, too. Thanks.

  • http://waynebreitbarth.wordpress.com/ wayne breitbarth

    Great post. Very insightful and well thought out.

    I love the Johnny Depp thought. If you give it some time to settle in, has some great potential.

    It is also this type of thinking and action that will differentiate you from the other people in your market that just..blah, blah, blan…all the lingo.

    • http://www.spaighttalk.com Sue Spaight

      Hi, Wayne. Thanks for stopping by and commenting. Agree – how better to differentiate and connect than demonstrating your commitment instead of just blah blah blahing about it.

  • Natalie

    I’m usually thinking about engagement, but involvement is truly a better approach. Now begins the brainstorming to see what involvement means for me.

    • http://www.spaighttalk.com Sue Spaight

      Thanks, Natalie and good luck with your brainstorming :-) Let me know if I can be of help. -Sue

  • http://www.tommartin.typepad.com tom martin

    Sue

    Love the involvement vs engagement point… hadn’t thought of it like that but have to say, totally agree.

    The showing up point too has such great merit. On my way right now to meet with a new social media client and think I’ll spend the lunch meeting talking about how their brand can “show up” which has my mind spinning… thanks for that friend.
    @TomMartin

    • http://www.spaighttalk.com Sue Spaight

      Hi, Tom. Thanks for the great feedback. Glad that my getting up at the crack of dawn this morning was worthwhile/helpful. Any time I can get someone’s mind spinning, especially a mind as sharp as yours, I’m a very happy camper. Hope your lunch goes well! -Sue

  • http://JimRaffel.com Jim Raffel

    Sue,
    I say on the sidelines of #saveteecycle because I wasn’t sure what I as supposed to do. Then, at the eleventh hour I figured it out and you went all in to deliver a stunning guest post for my blog. I’m not a big fan of guest posts on a blog with my name on it but your was awesome. It was the little thing I could do to help. With hundreds of us all doing little things the event turned into an obvious success under the guidance and leadership of you and Ms. Katie :)

    • http://www.spaighttalk.com Sue Spaight

      Hi, Jim. You’re exactly right, some people got involved in little ways and some in huge ways and that’s exactly what we hoped for…for everyone to do exactly what they could. I think Katie and I would love to have invested even more time, to reach out to specific individuals like yourself to get involved earlier, and to make sure that it truly was easy enough for everyone to get involved in their own way. Some of the people who raised their hands from the beginning as “in” for helping, we never had a chance to circle back with them and get them involved, because the whole thing was such a wonderful whirlwind. Thanks for getting involved – the guest post was a really awesome contribution! -Sue

  • http://www.expedientmeans.com Steve Furman

    Sue,

    I really like your parsing engagement vs. involvement. Engaging is passive, like a hobby, but involvement is much more serious. A commitment and more professional. Brands desire engagement but really want involvement. Social Media gives brands a chance to get involved and that in turn has more potential in getting consumers involved in the brand.

    You sparked a blog post of my own. Thank you!

    Steve

    expedientmeans.com

    • http://www.spaighttalk.com Sue Spaight

      Thanks, Steve. I’m glad the post was relevant and inspired you : )