Why “Social Business” Matters...

Is the term “Social Business” relevant, or just more jargon? Geoff Livingston posed this question on Twitter recently and suggested I blog about it when evidently I was the only taker in favor of the term. I am a huge fan, and here’s why.
Social strategy can operate at different levels within an organization:
“Social media” strategy suggests that social plays a small, supporting role — just another media channel. This mentality is from whence where one-way “push” messaging and lame Twitter promotions are born.
“Social marketing” conveys that social has a more significant seat at the table — could impact product plans, pricing, distribution, not just promotion.
“Social business”, at the highest level, communicates “This is an organization that gives a damn. Social responsibility and social communication are at the heart of what we do.” This might not be exactly how others are defining it, but this is how I think it should be used.
Now, take three brands/companies, one functioning at each level. Which do you think is going to have the greatest success using social media channels? BINGO. The one that actually gives a damn.
Take Ben & Jerry’s as an example. Even though they are owned by Unilever, they have, in my opinion both as a consumer and as a marketer, retained their soul. Here’s a nice video interview of Walt Freese, the company’s Chief Euphoria officer, talking about how they have done so.
Instead of having one trite mission statement, the company has three – product, economic, and social – that ring true. This is their social mission: “To operate the company in a way that actively recognizes the central role that business plays in society by initiating innovative ways to improve the quality of life locally, nationally and internationally.”
So, when a true Social Business like Ben & Jerry’s launches a Social Marketing or Social Media effort – like changing the name of Chubby Hubby to Hubby Hubby in celebration of Vermont gay marriage (Mashable article on that here) what happens?
Magic. Because it’s strategic. It’s real. It’s talkable. It’s legitimately social, not faux or contrived social.
Best Buy’s Twelpforce is an example I have seen used to define “Social Business”. And while I think their Social Marketing programs like Blue Shirt Nation and Twelpforce are solid, I do not truly think of them as a Social Business. They are doing Social for Marketing purposes, not doing Business with a Social purpose. Likewise, Dell, Zappos, other organizations where social marketing runs through the veins and arteries of the organization, but social values don’t really lie at the heart of it.
The definition of social business – where the line is – is highly debatable. I’m still thinking that through for myself and would value your thoughts. But personally, I do not think whether or not Social Business matters is all that debatable.
Having fun and brand personality matter, too. Stop by Ben & Jerry’s website. There are an awful lot of brands out there that could learn a lot from this one, on many many levels.



